A magazine where the digital world meets the real world.
On the web
- Browse by date
- Browse by topic
- Enter the maze
- Get our RSS feed
- Follow us on Twitter
- Resources for teachers
What is cs4fn?
- About us
- Contact us
- Privacy and cookies
- Copyright and contributions
- Links to other fun sites
- Complete our questionnaire and get a free magic download
The Woman of the Future?!?
Thomas Edison is a household name, a great man, a great thinker, an extraordinarily prolific inventor with over a 1000 patents to his name. He invented the lightbulb (or did he!), now the iconic image for "bright idea". Think of great inventors, great scientists and most people find it much easier to list men than women. Why is that? Try it. Before you read on, name some great female Scientists or Engineers?
There are lots but most find them hard to think of. You thought of Marie Curie perhaps? Edison had a reason as he described in an article in Good HouseKeeping in 1912 called "The Woman of the Future":
"Direct thought is not at present an attribute of femininity. In this woman is now centuries, ages even epochs behind man"
This is of course total garbage.
The trouble is men keep saying stupid things like that.
What was Marie Curie doing around the time Edison was writing his ridiculous statement? Well actually it was the year before in 1911 that she had won the second of her Nobel prizes. She is of course one of the few people to have won two Nobel prizes and one of only two to win the prize in two different subjects. Not bad for someone "epochs behind men".
Whilst Edison was amassing his wealth and patents, Curie did not patent the radium-isolation process she invented. Who was the smarter? His aim was to be rich and famous. Hers was to allow scientific research to continue without the barriers patents put up. Who was the greater thinker? Perhaps women do things differently.
It is easy for famous people, even famous scientists to make great announcements that aren't based on science, that people then take more seriously than they should. The message of science though is clear:
Do NOT believe things just because of the person who says it. Look for the evidence. If there isn't enough to be sure, look for more.
So what of women and computer science. Most people would say it is a male dominated subject. The truth is much more interesting. Women have played pivotal roles from the start. The first programmer was a women: Ada Lovelace. Grace Hopper's work was central in the move from low level programming languages to high-level ones. Fran Allen was awarded the 2006 Turing Prize, the most prestigious prize a Computer Scientist can win, for her work laying the foundation for modern optimizing compilers. Great female thinkers are still in the thick of things as they have been throughout, and student computer scientists are up there, despite being fewer in numbers, outperforming the men. Why shouldn't they? Computer Science requires great thinkers: innovative people who are creative, social team players, just like most other subjects. Both men and women can have those attributes.
In the coming articles, we will show you some of the evidence about some of those pivotal women computer scientists. Watch this space. We start below with some recent innovative ideas from women.